¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º

¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º º»¹®³»¿ë ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸ÞÀθ޴º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

ÁÖ¿ä¾È³»

HOME »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

FONT SIZE

ÆùƮũ±â Å°¿ò 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% ÆùƮũ±â ÁÙÀÓ
¸Þ´ºº¸±â
Á¦¸ñ
20201008_·ù´Ù¿î
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ
2020-10-08
Á¶È¸¼ö
129


Reference and comparison values for ecological indicators in assessing restoration areas in the Atlantic Forest
ViníciusLondeaFabianoTurini FarahbRicardoRibeiro RodriguesbFernandoRoberto Martinsac
Ecological Indicators Volume 110, March 2020, 105928
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105928
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ:
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏÀÌ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
´ÙÀ½±Û
20201007_À̹μö
/ À̹μö
Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.15314?campaign=wolearlyview
ÀÌÀü±Û
20201008_È«Á¤Çö
/ jhhong
1.Finkral, A. J., & Evans, A. M. (2008). The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest.Forest Ecology and Management,255(7), 2743-2750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.041 2.Comfort, E. J., Roberts, S. D., & Harrington, C. A. ..