¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º

¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º º»¹®³»¿ë ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸ÞÀθ޴º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

ÁÖ¿ä¾È³»

HOME »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

FONT SIZE

ÆùƮũ±â Å°¿ò 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% ÆùƮũ±â ÁÙÀÓ
¸Þ´ºº¸±â
Á¦¸ñ
20210802_±è¼­Çö
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ
2021-08-02
Á¶È¸¼ö
82


1. Schachtman, D. P., & Goodger, J. Q. (2008). Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought. Trends in plant science, 13(6), 281-287.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.003

2. Comas, L., Becker, S., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013). Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in plant science, 4, 442.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00442

3. Cohen, D., Bogeat-Triboulot, M. B., Tisserant, E., Balzergue, S., Martin-Magniette, M. L., Lelandais, G., ... & Hummel, I. (2010). Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: a meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes. BMC genomics, 11(1), 1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-630
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ:
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏÀÌ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
´ÙÀ½±Û
±³¼ö´Ô²²_Á¦°¡ È­ºÐÀ¸·Î Çß´ø ½ÇÇè°á°ú¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
/ º¯½Ã¿¬
Àúµµ Áú¼Ò ½Ãºñ¸¦ ÇÑ°÷¿¡¼­ Áú¼Ò Èí¼ö°¡ ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÑ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇß¾úÁö¸¸ º» ³í¹®Àº Á¦°¡ Çß´ø ÁÖÀåÀ» ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºµ¿À§¿ø¼Ò¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Áõ¸íÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù. ´ÙÀ½ ¼öÁ¤¶§³ª ´Ù½Ã Á¦ÃâÇÒ¶§ ¸¹Àº µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °Í °°½À´Ï´Ù. °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù! º¯½Ã¿¬ ¿Ã¸²
ÀÌÀü±Û
210802_±èÇö¼®_½Ã¿¬¹ßÇ¥
/ ±èÇö¼®
Phenotypic integration does not constrain phenotypic plasticity: differential plasticity of traits is associated to their integration across environments Silvia Matesanz,Mario Blanco-Sánchez,Marina Ramos-Muñoz,Marcelino de la Cruz,Raquel Benavides,Adrián Escudero First publish..