¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º

¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸Þ´º º»¹®³»¿ë ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ¸ÞÀθ޴º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

ÁÖ¿ä¾È³»

HOME »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

FONT SIZE

ÆùƮũ±â Å°¿ò 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% ÆùƮũ±â ÁÙÀÓ
¸Þ´ºº¸±â
Á¦¸ñ
20201116_È«Á¤Çö
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ
2020-11-16
Á¶È¸¼ö
107


1. Nardini, A., Õunapuu-Pikas, E., & Savi, T. (2014). When smaller is better: leaf hydraulic conductance and drought vulnerability correlate to leaf size and venation density across four Coffea arabica genotypes. Functional Plant Biology41(9), 972-982.

https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13302

2. McAdam, S. A., & Brodribb, T. J. (2015). Hormonal dynamics contributes to divergence in seasonal stomatal behaviour in a monsoonal plant community. Plant, cell & environment38(3), 423-432.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12398

3. Lovisolo, C., Perrone, I., Hartung, W., & Schubert, A. (2008). An abscisic acid‐related reduced transpiration promotes gradual embolism repair when grapevines are rehydrated after drought. New phytologist180(3), 642-651.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02592.x
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ:
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏÀÌ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
´ÙÀ½±Û
20201117_·ù´Ù¿î
/ ·ù´Ù¿î
Evaluating Restoration Treatment Effectiveness through a Comparison of Residual Composition, Structure, and Spatial Pattern with Historical Reference Sites Miles E LeFevre, Derek J Churchill, Andrew J Larson, Sean M A Jeronimo, Jamie Bass, Jerry F Franklin, Van R Kane Forest Science, Volume 66, Is..
ÀÌÀü±Û
20201116_Narayan Bhusal
/ Narayan Bhusal
Plant height and hydraulic vulnerability to drought and cold https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721728115 PNASJuly 17, 2018115(29)7551-7556